 |
| Charlottesville 2020 |
Attorney Leonard French discusses the concept of non fungible
token (NFT) on the blockchain (or on a blockchain, as there can be many) to establish
ownership of digital property.
One problem is that someone could file a fraudulent
claim of ownership, which would be a crime, in a manner comparable to
falsifying closing papers for a real estate or land closing.
A NFT would not stop others from viewing the property
or even storing it privately (although if they used P2P or BitTorrent they
would still get caught).
Also today I found an 8-minute video by Julia Galef
about the value of Bayesian thinking. Yes, generally a Bayesian thinker (as a
critical thinker) would be more likely not to overestimate the value of new
evidence that seems to validate their (political or social) beliefs. A good question might be, was James Damore’s
essay at Google about gender in tech employment a good example of Bayesian
thinking?
No comments:
Post a Comment