Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Can a live rodeo be protected by copyright: another frivolous DMCA safe harbor case

Electronic Frontier Foundation reports (Feb. 12) that a group called SHARK, (Showing Animals Respect and Kindness) has settled a potential legal battle with PRCA, the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association. PRCA had complained about YouTube videos showing potential abuse of animals taken by SHARK activists. PRCA claimed that this was “copyright infringement”, and had YouTube take down the videos under DMCA safe harbor. However, a rodeo itself cannot be copyrighted, although an exhibitor can prohibit photography. I wonder about the same question about a video from a drama or play. It’s always illegal to videotape movies in theaters (and people have been prosecuted for that).

The EFF story, by Michael Kwun, is titled “Animal Welfare Advocates Settle Online Video Battle With Cowboy Group; Meritless Copyright Claims Won't Interfere With YouTube Rodeo Critiques,” with link here. PRCA is also paying SHARK for improper takedown notices.

The story has a link to the settlement agreement, dated Feb. 4

There is also a link to EFF’s “No Downtime for Free Speech Campaign” to try to give speakers some legal leverage for getting material restored quickly after frivolous DMCA takedown notices.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I'm no expert, but I can answer a couple of questions.

Copyright protection is very broad for the arts. The actual phrase of what is not protected is "live, unscripted events". So to answer your question, live plays and dramas are protected as long as they are scripted.

The second part of what is protected is anything affixed to a media. So that covers movies, DVDs, CDs, books, etc.

If the PRCA tried to sell a videotape of a rodeo, that videotape would now have copyright protection because it has been affixed to a media.