A disturbing ruling from the Third Circuit (Philadelphia) about a case in the Virgin Islands territory established a dangerous precedent, perhaps, saying that a blogger(s) could be liable for creating a “hostile environment” for apartment or condo residents. The specific case concerns a blog post(s) that complained about residents maintaining emotional support dogs despite a "no dogs" rule.
Intellectual Takeout has a detailed story here by Hans Bade and provides the opinion, referring to the Fair Housing Act (which sounds bizarre, to hold this up to another “peer” resident speaking out).
I would watch this development carefully, especially if I downsize in the future and move into a highrise myself.
It had occurred to me before thought that this sort of problem could arise. I’m more familiar myself with this possibility in the workplace, especially for people with direct reports.
There was criticism that the First Amendment defense wasn’t used well, as in this Cato Institute post by Walter Olson